Edición de «Rich Dad Poor Dad Evaluate»
Advertencia: no has iniciado sesión. Tu dirección IP se hará pública si haces cualquier edición en estas condiciones. Si inicias sesión o creas una cuenta, tus ediciones se atribuirán a tu nombre de usuario, además de otros beneficios.
Puedes deshacer la edición. Antes de deshacer la edición, comprueba la siguiente comparación para verificar que realmente es lo que quieres hacer, y entonces guarda los cambios para así efectuar la reversión.
Revisión actual | Tu texto | ||
Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
− | Since its debut in 1997, Robert T. Kiyosaki’s Robert Kiyosaki’s Rich Dad, Poor Dad has been a landmark amongst personal finance books, a | + | Since its debut in 1997, Robert T. Kiyosaki’s Robert Kiyosaki’s Rich Dad, Poor Dad has been a landmark amongst personal finance books, a finest-seller that has sold practically 40 million copies worldwide.<br><br>I first read the book back in 2000, once I was still a budding entrepreneur. I figured I might re-read it now that I've more experience underneath my belt. I also wanted to see if it’s held up to the test of time, and if I would love it as a lot as I did when I first read Rich Dad, Poor Dad. Rather a lot has occurred financially in the past 20 years, and I’m curious if some of Kyosaki’s predictions came true.<br><br>After I first read the book, I primarily preferred how Kiyosaki considered the world from a special perspective. It obtained me to think differently about my business and investing than I had previously.<br><br>Kiyosaki seems to be a polarizing determine: You both love or hate his work. The Simple Dollar assessment of Kiyosaki’s work, for example, adds a whole lot of personal bias, and I don’t think that’s fair.<br><br>I attempt to take a more neutral viewpoint and can review the book based upon my expertise within the business world.<br><br>Rich Dad, Poor Dad must be viewed as a general starting point — a investment/startup summary, moderately than a list of specific items to do as an entrepreneur.<br><br>Robert Kiyosaki emphasizes six key factors through out the book. These points — which differentiate between his "poor" dad (his real dad) and the "rich" dad that helped him perceive business and turn into wealthy — are:<br><br>The rich don’t work for money<br>The significance of economic literacy<br>Minding your personal enterprise<br>Taxes and firms<br>The [https://youtu.be/Gwtq9NtIviA rich dad poor dad audio] invent cash<br>The need to work to study and to not work for money<br><br>Good Points in the Book<br>Flawed Instructional System<br>As Robert mentions many occasions in the book, our traditional academic system is flawed. Our training system is designed primarily to create employees and could be a negative affect for an entrepreneur. As Kiyosaki mentions, he’s not suggesting that individuals skip higher training; he’s suggesting higher education does not help with "road smarts." Financial literacy is something that is not often mentioned in school, and if it is discussed, it is only at primary levels. Based mostly upon my personal background, I’ve made this a personal focus and can make sure that my children are well educated in this subject.<br>The cost of education continues to increase a lot sooner than the rate of inflation. It’s becoming more clear our training system is broken. Robert’s statements about this matter are accurate.<br><br>Being an Entrepreneur Is Less Risky<br>The popular belief is that proudly owning a business is riskier than working for someone else. In my opinion, proudly owning a enterprise provides you all types of self-reliance expertise you would not get when working for somebody else. If anything, with right now’s "cradle to grave" mentality, we're creating more dependent individuals.<br><br>Proudly owning a enterprise has given me a lot more independence and plenty of more invaluable abilities I could still use if I were to work for somebody else. On a weekly foundation, I now do things I used to consider risky or may by no means imagine doing earlier than owning a business.<br><br>Your Major Residence Is NOT an Asset<br>Over the years it usually has been accepted that your primary residence is an asset. Robert flat-out states (I imagine accurately) that your property will not be an asset, because it does not generate optimistic cash flow. The housing bubble and collapse proved this correct. |